My subjective impression is that chemists are better at producing useful review articles, both in quality and quantity, than physicists. I particularly like Accounts in Chemical Research, Advances in Chemical Physics, Chemical Reviews, and Annual Review in Physical Chemistry. Hence, I was delighted to see that last year Annual Reviews started a new line, Annual Reviews in Condensed Matter Physics.
The Table of Contents of the first volume looks very promising.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Nobel Prize Predictions for 2026
This week Nobel Prizes will be announced. Predicting the awardees is a fun annual exercise. It is also good to reflect on what has been achi...
-
This week Nobel Prizes will be announced. I have not done predictions since 2020 . This is a fun exercise. It is also good to reflect on w... -
Two years ago, I wrote a post about a paper by Wei et al, Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models Then last year, I posted about a pap...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
No comments:
Post a Comment