My subjective impression is that chemists are better at producing useful review articles, both in quality and quantity, than physicists. I particularly like Accounts in Chemical Research, Advances in Chemical Physics, Chemical Reviews, and Annual Review in Physical Chemistry. Hence, I was delighted to see that last year Annual Reviews started a new line, Annual Reviews in Condensed Matter Physics.
The Table of Contents of the first volume looks very promising.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Leo Szilard to the Tasmanian wilderness
Richard Flanagan is an esteemed Australian writer. My son recently gave our family a copy of Flanagan's recent book, Question 7 . It is...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
No comments:
Post a Comment