I finally read through the paper, Covalency of the Hydrogen Bond in Ice: A Direct X-Ray Measurement by E. D. Isaacs, A. Shukla, P. M. Platzman, D. R. Hamann, B. Barbiellini, and C. A. Tulk.
They do a Compton scattering experiment (X-rays are inelastically scattered of the electrons) on an ice crystal. The paragraph below explains the basic physics.
The key figure in the paper is below. The red dots show the measured difference between the momentum dependence of the Compton scattering in different directions. The solid curve is the prediction of a band structure calculation which implicitly assumes complete quantum coherence (i.e. covalency). In contrast an electrostatic model (with no quantum coherence) gives the dot-dashed line which exhibits little anisotropy. The peaks in the inset at 1.7 and 2.85 Angstroms correspond to the H bond length and shortest Oxygen-Oxygen distance.
Aside. With regard to the solid curve above, the authors state, "There are no adjustable parameters in the theory except that a 40% reduction of the theory is required". Sounds like one adjustable parameter, to me!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Can AI solve quantum-many body problems?
I find it difficult to wade through all the hype about AI, along with the anecdotes about its failings to reliably answer basic questions. G...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
This week Nobel Prizes will be announced. I have not done predictions since 2020 . This is a fun exercise. It is also good to reflect on w...
-
Nitrogen fluoride (NF) seems like a very simple molecule and you would think it would very well understood, particularly as it is small enou...


No comments:
Post a Comment