This week in the Quantum Many-Body Theory reading group we look at Chapter 6 of Advanced Solid State Physics by Philip Phillips, concerning local magnetic moments in metals and the Anderson model.
Here are my random notes.
The essential physics is captured by the Hartree-Fock solution.
The Coulomb repulsion (Hubbard U) leads to qualitatively different behaviour: the formation of local moments. This is embodied in the zero-temperature phase diagram.
I suspect that when Anderson published this diagram in 1961 this was a new way of looking at a quantum many-body problem.
It is all about competition between the three energy scales: U, the hybridisation energy, and the energy separation of the Fermi energy and the localised energy level.
Anderson shared the Nobel Prize in 1977 with Mott and Van Vleck. Anderson was cited for this work on local moments and localisation due to disorder.
The model and the associated physics has a relevance that goes far beyond the question of local moments in metals. It is at the heart of dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) treatments of Hubbard models and electronic structure calculations that capture correlations better than DFT-based approaches.
The model also describes quantum dots in semiconductor heterostructures (which have tuneable Hamiltonian parameters) and chemisorption of atoms on metal surfaces (Anderson-Newns model).
Anderson's solution is actually "wrong"! At zero temperature the ground state is always a spin singlet. However, these singlets only form at low temperatures (below the Kondo temperature).
In the local moment regime the Anderson model reduces to the Kondo model (chapter 7).
The model turns out to be exactly soluble with the Bethe ansatz. This was shown by Tsvelick and Wiegmann in the early 80's. They showed that the ground state is always a singlet at zero temperature.
No comments:
Post a Comment