Normally when I prepare a lecture I tend to follow the strategy:
1. Read the textbook.
2. If need be look at other books.
3. Write a summary of the relevant part of the book.
4. Work this into a lecture.
Today I followed a different procedure.
1. Don't look at any books.
2. From memory, write out rough notes with the key ideas, equations, and graphs that I want to communicate.
3. Look at the text to just check and polish details.
4. Rework the rough notes into "neat" notes for the lecture.
The end result was this lecture on Transport properties of metals in the Bloch model.
I think the advantage of this different approach is that it helps prevent one getting bogged down in details that are tangential to the essential points. This might be good for students because it may make the main points clearer. It is also good for me because it saves all the time I sometimes spend struggling through these minor details and worrying about whether or not to include them in the lecture.
I also found that the actual lecture flowed better because more of it was "in my head" rather than stuck in the notes. However, ultimately students should be the judge.
I welcome thoughts on this and on alternative strategies.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Leo Szilard to the Tasmanian wilderness
Richard Flanagan is an esteemed Australian writer. My son recently gave our family a copy of Flanagan's recent book, Question 7 . It is...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
No comments:
Post a Comment