We teach it to undergraduates [as I am doing today!] and claim that it captures many properties of elemental metals? Then we say it works badly for cuprates and other strongly correlated electron metals. But, just how good is it? Surely, this should be in textbooks. But, it actually took me a long time to find the graph below. It shows the frequency dependence of the real and imaginary part of the dielectric constant for gold. The solid lines are the Drude predictions with two free parameters, the dc conductivity and the quasi-particle scattering time. The experimental data covers the range 50 to 20,000 cm-1.
The figure is from an Applied Optics paper by Ordal et al.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Lecture on Debye model for solids
I just finished preparing my undergraduate lecture on the Debye model for solids. Here are my slides . The course is a third-year course on...
-
An interesting and controversial question for Ph.D's in science and engineering is too what extent students should be expected to have ...
-
Some of my colleagues and I have started an interesting discussion about how to teach quantum theory to undergraduates. We have courses in t...
-
As years go by the PhD thesis in science and engineering is less and less of a ``thesis'' and more just a box to tick. There was a t...

No comments:
Post a Comment