APS News has a fascinating article A Cold-War Folly? by Nina Byers. She describes a course entitled Nuclear Power: Power plants and weapons of war that she teaches UCLA undergraduates.
A couple of things I found particularly interesting. First, the graph below showing the dramatic variation in nuclear weapon stockpiles with time. Second, the diverse views that physicists (esp. famous ones) had about the use of nuclear weapons, both against Japan, and after the war. Third, it was a good reminder that our current undergraduates were actually born after the end of the cold war!
A great strength of the US college system compared to Australia and Europe is the flexibility of the curriculum and broad general education requirements that allow and encourage such courses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Superconductivity: a poster child for emergence
Superconductivity beautifully illustrates the characteristics of emergent properties. Novelty. Distinct properties of the superconducting s...

-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
No comments:
Post a Comment