I just encountered this simple and helpful question in the context of how and what we teach students.
If we teach science as a static body of knowledge (particularly facts, theories, and techniques) we are acting as if science is a noun.
By contrast, if we focus on teaching students to think scientifically and critically, to solve problems, and to ask questions, then we act as if science is a verb.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Characteristics of static disorder can emerge from electron-phonon interactions
Electronic systems with large amounts of static disorder can exhibit distinct properties, including localisation of electronic states and su...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
Q. what's the past tense of science?
ReplyDeleteA "Republican"...although perhaps it's the future imperfect or "present denial" tense