Yesterday I came across a 1944 paper by Fairbank which contained the figure below for copper with tin impurities:
Does anyone know of better data?
Any simple explanations for these deviations?
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Violating a text book rule
Solid state physics text books tell us that Matthiessen's rule is obeyed by simple metals: the temperature dependent resistivity is the sum of a temperature independent term due to elastic scattering off impurities and an impurity independent term which is temperature dependent due to inelastic scattering. I teach this to undergrads, but have struggled to actually find experimental data to show them.
Yesterday I came across a 1944 paper by Fairbank which contained the figure below for copper with tin impurities:
It looks pretty convincing. However, the text points out that the temperature dependence actually varies significantly with the impurity concentration, in violation of Matthiesens rule!
Yesterday I came across a 1944 paper by Fairbank which contained the figure below for copper with tin impurities:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Leo Szilard to the Tasmanian wilderness
Richard Flanagan is an esteemed Australian writer. My son recently gave our family a copy of Flanagan's recent book, Question 7 . It is...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
No comments:
Post a Comment