Roald Hoffmann and Jean-Paul Malrieu are two of my favourite living theoretical chemists. Both greatly value the role of concepts and intellectual clarity in theory. Hoffmann has featured in 22 posts on this blog.
They recently published a wonderful trilogy in Angewandte Chemie.
Simulation vs. Understanding: A Tension, in Quantum Chemistry and Beyond.
Part B. The March of Simulation, for Better or Worse
I add this trilogy to my list of 5 papers every computational chemistry student should read, suggested by me a decade ago. [Malrieu is author of one of those and Hoffmann co-author of another.]
Although the trilogy addresses and uses specific examples from computational quantum chemistry it is just as relevant to anyone interested in computational materials science. Actually, I hope that anyone interested in materials science would read and digest it as it gives a sober and balanced perspective about the relationship between theory, simulation, and understanding.
Articles are timely as they address hype about how AI techniques will "revolutionise" materials theory.
The articles are beautifully written and engage with broader themes such as philosophy of science, culture, art, and politics.
Finally, I just love this photo of the two authors, both in their eighties. the photo reflects some of the joy they find in science, so beautifully expressed in these articles.
I thank Ben Powell for bringing the papers to my attention.
R Hoffmann's interview. He shines through as an excellent teacher.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjNGR45D1sM
His article in American Scientist about apprehensions of research and teaching getting separated has come full circle in most of the Universities.