Many physics exam questions I set are meant to be "simple" and "easy", i.e. they aim to test understanding rather than the ability to
-do complicated algebra/calculus
-regurgitate large amounts of information
Hence, always look for a simple way to solve the problem. Never think "It can't be that simple", e.g., just plugging numbers into a single equation or just restating in different terms/words the answer to a previous part of the question.
If your answer involves pages of algebra you are almost certainly on the wrong track...
Try and be neat enough that the examiner can actually understand what you have done. Clearly explain what you are doing, including stating assumptions and results you are using. Don't just write lines of equation.
Don't try and fake derivations.
Include and keep track of physical units in all calculations.
Clearly label axes and scales of all graphs.
Don't waffle. If you don't have an explanation don't make up one by stringing together buzzwords.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Leo Szilard to the Tasmanian wilderness
Richard Flanagan is an esteemed Australian writer. My son recently gave our family a copy of Flanagan's recent book, Question 7 . It is...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
Hi Ross!
ReplyDeleteMy philosophy as well!
"Many physics exam questions I set are meant to be "simple" and "easy", i.e. they aim to test understanding rather than the ability to..."
What I noticed is that these "easy/understanding" questions are often the most difficult...probably because most of the time students focus on the mechanics of the calculation rather on the underlying physics.
Eric