Many fundamental processes in biology such as signalling and energy conversion make use of the transport and storage of protons within proteins. One widely studied example occurs in vision; in the membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin. Absorption of a photon leads to isomerisation of the retinal molecule which eventually leads to transport of a protein across the cell membrane, resulting in an electrical signal in your nerves.
Hence, a key question concerns the location of the protons at different stages of the process. Generally, high-resolution crystal structures (from X-rays) do not reveal the location of protons.
Over the past decade it has become more appreciated that the location of water molecules inside the protein can provide a key functional role due to their ability to form hydrogen bonds which allow take up and release of protons.
In 2006 a Nature paper by Garczarek and Gerwert used infra-red spectroscopy to investigate the proton dynamics and argued that the water molecules inside the protein were responsible for storing the protons. This picture was supported by a PNAS paper by Mathias and Marx, reporting quantum dynamical calculations which treated the protons at the fully quantum level.
However, a PNAS paper from two years ago [featured in a post two days ago] offers a distinctly different picture. It argues that the proton is shared between oxygen atoms at the carboxylic acid end of the amino acids Glu194 and Glu204.
Glu=glutamine
The carboxylic acid is the C-OOH group at the lower right
So what do I learn from all this?
- there are still fundamental problems in molecular biology which are still waiting to be solved [and some of them involve quantum dynamics!]
- one needs to be very careful in the interpretation of experiments and calculations. This is why the method of multiple hypotheses are so important.
- the character of hydrogen bonds is somewhat universal and so deducing from spectroscopic signatures which molecules the O-...H...-O unit is attached to is a tenuous process.
- as emphasized in the earlier post, small details in the crystal structure can have significant implications.
No comments:
Post a Comment