The wonders of gallium

 A friend recently showed me that solid gallium can melt in your hand.

I did not know this. I was quite familiar with liquid mercury, but not gallium. 

The existence of elemental gallium was predicted by Mendeleev in 1869 after he constructed the periodic table. It was discovered within six years. He was able to predict that it would have a low-melting temperature, based on extrapolations from the known melting temperatures of elements close to it in the periodic table.

Solid gallium is soft enough to be cut with a knife.

Three different stable crystal structures for solid gallium are shown below.


The phase diagram of pure gallium is shown below.

Note the negative slope of the phase boundary between the liquid and the solid alpha-Ga. This is like water. It follows from the Clausius-Clapeyron equation that the solid state has lower density than the liquid state. Gallium is the only elemental metal with this property. (The semi-metals antinomy and bismuth also do).

Gallium remains liquid over a wider range of temperatures (2373 K) than any other known substance.

The figures above are taken from the following paper from 2020.

Ab initio phase diagram and nucleation of gallium  Haiyang Niu, Luigi Bonati, Pablo M. Piaggi, and Michele Parrinello

Unfortunately, that paper does not provide much insight into the low melting temperature. The key is that the solid state contains dimers of Ga, that are weakly bonded to each other. A helpful discussion is the introduction to the following paper.

On the bonding of Ga2, structures of Gan clusters and the relation to the bulk structure of gallium 

N. Gaston and A.J. Parker

The image above is from the entry on Gallium in the beautiful book The Elements by Theodore Gray.

I thank my young friend Alexey for introducing me to the wonders of gallium.

Comments

  1. AnonymousSeptember 22, 2022 at 3:39 PM

    If I could make a blog post request, what are your thoughts on the new evidence for super exchange mediated superconductivity in the cuprates from the Davis STM group?

    The press release for the paper has the highly provocative title "High Temperature Superconductivity Understood at Last". We've seen many titles like this before, but to me this seems special coming from a highly reputable group working on the topic.

    https://www.quantamagazine.org/high-temperature-superconductivity-understood-at-last-20220921/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ross H. McKenzieOctober 4, 2022 at 10:42 AM

      Thanks for asking. I also saw that Quanta article and had similar questions and concerns to you.
      I will look at the paper
      https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2207449119
      and see if I have anything to say.
      Others should feel free to weigh in.

      Delete
    2. Ross H. McKenzieOctober 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM

      I just posted about the paper.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is it an Unidentified Superconducting Object (USO)?

If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new material. There is a long history of this and it is worth considering the wise observations of Robert Cava , back in 1997, contained in a tutorial lecture. It would have been useful indeed in the early days of the field [cuprate superconductors] to have set up a "commission" to set some minimum standard of data quality and reproducibility for reporting new superconductors. An almost countless number of "false alarms" have been reported in the past decade, some truly spectacular. Koichi Kitazawa from the University of Tokyo coined these reports "USOs", for Unidentified Superconducting Objects , in a clever cross-cultural double entendre likening them to UFOs (Unidentified Flying Objects, which certainly are their equivalent in many ways) and to "lies" in the Japanese translation of USO.   These have caused g
Read more

What is Herzberg-Teller coupling?

Image
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thrown around. Google scholar yields more than 3000 hits. But I have found its precise meaning and the relevant physics hard to pin down. Quantum mechanics in chemistry by Schatz and Ratner is an excellent book , but the discussion on page 204 did not help me. "Herzberg-Teller" never appears in Atkins' Molecular quantum mechanics. So here is my limited understanding. Herzberg and Teller wanted to understand why one observed certain vibronic (combined electronic and vibrational) transitions that were not expected, particularly some that were expected to be forbidden on symmetry grounds. " Intensity borrowing " occurred. Herzberg and Teller pointed out that his could be understood if the dipole transition moment for the electronic transition depended on the nuclear co-ordinate associated with the vibration. In the Franck-Condo
Read more

What should be the order of authors on a conference poster or talk?

I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With regard to paper authorship my general rule is that the person who does the bulk of the work, including actually writing the paper should be the first author. Doug Natelson has a good post on co-authorship , that I largely agree with. My only difference is that I am not really convinced that good practice prevails in the majority of circumstances. I fear there are increasing numbers of co-authors, particularly senior ones, with marginal contributions. But, what about conference talks and posters? Many of these are based on work that is already or about to be published. Should the author order be identical as the associated papers? I am not sure it should necessarily be. My tentative view is that the person who writes and submits the abstract and actually prepares and presents the post/talk should be the first author. Perhaps they should also highlig
Read more