Dimitri Mendeleev, who proposed the periodic table of the elements, purely from phenomenology and without quantum mechanics!
He even successfully predicted the existence of new elements and their properties.
A friend who is a high school teacher [but not a scientist] asked me about how he should teach the periodic table to chemistry students. It is something that students often memorise, especially in rote-learning cultures, but have little idea about what it means and represents. It makes logical sense, even without quantum mechanics. This video nicely captures both how brilliant Mendeleev was and the logic behind the table.
A key idea is how each column contains elements with similar chemical and physical properties and that as one goes down the column there are systematic trends.
It is good for students to see this with their own eyes.
This video from the Royal Society of Chemistry shows in spectacular fashion how the alkali metals are all highly reactive and that as one goes down the column the reactivity increases.
The next amazing part of the story is how once quantum theory came along it all started to make sense!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A very effective Hamiltonian in nuclear physics
Atomic nuclei are complex quantum many-body systems. Effective theories have helped provide a better understanding of them. The best-known a...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
Good post to remind all about intuition in the age writing funding proposals for doing repetitive work. Prof Dan Singletons Chem Prof Texas A&M quote is valid for your posting
ReplyDeleteDan Singleton @dasingleton Apr 19
"Do not underestimate the old-timers of science. They had intuition. We have calculations. We are diminished"
Off-topic: I think you might be interested in this paper:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.pnas.org/content/114/32/8493.abstract.html
as it is consistent with statements you have made here before.
Thanks.
DeleteI am glad that paper finally got published. I had blogged about it last year.
http://condensedconcepts.blogspot.in/2016/11/photosynthesis-is-incoherent.html