Four important goals to me are to teach students:
1. To think.
2. To think like a physicist.
3. To think like a condensed matter physicist.
4. The specific technical content of the course.
The last one is arguably easier than the others.
I also think it is the least important. Others will disagree.
We don't reflect enough on how we might achieve the other goals.
The biggest challenge of improving education in the Majority World is not lack of material resources but changing the culture of rote learning and teaching critical thinking.
[This is highlighted in a NYTimes piece about China and a very funny video about India ITs].
Last week the UQ School of Maths and Physics Teaching Seminar was given by Peter Ellerton who works for the UQ Critical Thinking project.
The slides from a similar talk are here.
In the talk he mostly walked us through the three graphics shown here.
[If you click on the image you can see a high resolution .pdf]
The main value of all this is it puts names, categories, and questions on what I want to do. I found the third graphic the most helpful because it has some very specific questions we can ask students to get them to reflect more on what they are learning and in the process learn to think more critically.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A very effective Hamiltonian in nuclear physics
Atomic nuclei are complex quantum many-body systems. Effective theories have helped provide a better understanding of them. The best-known a...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.04870.pdf
ReplyDeleteTeaching critical thinking
N.G. Holmes
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Carl E. Wieman
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA and
Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
D.A. Bonn
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
Then a general one may or may not be relevant
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-questioning-mind-newton-darwin-einstein/505
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-intuitive-parent/201703/the-emerging-crisis-in-critical-thinking
ReplyDeleteThe Emerging Crisis in Critical Thinking
Today's college students all too often struggle with real world problem solving.
"Similarly, in their book, “Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses,” Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa studied twenty-four hundred college students at twenty-four different universities over a four-year period. They reported that critical thinking and other skills such as writing were no longer progressing during college as compared to previous generations of students." an extract from the article.
Stephen Camarata Ph.D.Prof of Medicine at Vanderbilt University.
I believe critical thinking and specific technical contents go hand in hand. If we teach students on the how specific technical contents came about, as well as the why/impact and the specific technical contents themselves, then students will automatically learn critical thinking because, they will learn the critical thoughts that lead to the particular invention. On the other hand, I don't think we can really teach critical thinking without going into specific technical contents because, critical thinking requires the ability to deeply analyse and evaluate certain issues. I don't think one can do such a deep analysis and/or evaluation without going into specific technical details.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is, many teach specific technical contents more as a "bag of tools", which then lead more to memorization rather than anything else.