Here I consider quantum many-body theory, as it spans from quantum field theory to nuclear physics to ultra cold atomic gases to solid state physics to quantum chemistry.
Here is my tentative list of the ten most important key concepts.
n.b. I am not concerned with key techniques (e.g. path integrals, renormalisation group, Green's functions, Feynman diagrams, imaginary time (KMS), numerical methods....). That is a separate topic. Unfortunately, in most many-body theory texts the concepts are lost in the midst of all the technical details. Furthermore, concepts are what experimentalists need to know and understand.
1. Emergence
This is the overarching concept that underscores almost all the others. Reality is stratified and at each length, energy, and time scale distinctly new phenomena, interactions and entities can emerge. More is different.
2. Effective Hamiltonians
At each strata there is some Hamiltonian that describes the "particles" and interactions between them. The parameters in this Hamiltonian can sometimes be determined from experiment.
3. Quasi-particles
There are two cases. In the simplest case, due to adiabatic continuity, the quasi-particles have the same quantum numbers and statistics as the constituent particles (e.g., Fermi liquid theory). But, their mass and spin-g factors can be significantly different from the free particles. The second and more exciting case is where the quasi-particles have different quantum numbers and/or statistics to
the constituent particles (e.g. Fractional Quantum Hall effect, spinons, and Luttinger liquid).
4. Renormalisation
This explains how the effective interactions at one strata are related to those at a lower strata (or equivalently how high energy virtual processes lead to low energy real interactions). Examples range from weak interactions in a Fermi liquid to asymptotic freedom in QCD to the van der Waals attraction between two neutral atoms.
5. Incoherent excitations
Sum rules provide a means to understand the redistribution of spectral weight. Quasi-particles don't exhaust the total spectral weight.
This also connects to Hubbard bands, bad metals, quantum decoherence, and the condensate fraction for superfluids and superconductors.
6. Spontaneously Broken Symmetry
This leads to new states of matter and new collective excitations, including Goldstone bosons (e.g. phonons and magnons) and massive particles such as the Higgs boson. This is also connected to rigidity, but that does have a classical analogue too.
7. Emergent energy scales
These can be orders of magnitude different (always smaller?) from the energy scales in the underlying Hamiltonian. Often they reflect non-perturbative effects, as in the BCS energy gap or the Kondo temperature.
8. Emergent length scales
9. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem
This means we can calculate linear transport (i.e. non-equilibrium) properties from fluctuations in thermal equilibrium. Inelastic scattering experiments can then be related to dynamical correlations.
10. Topology sometimes matters
Examples include topological excitations (e.g. vortices), topological terms in the action (e.g. for quantum spin chains and the Haldane conjecture), topological insulators, and topological order in the Quantum Hall effect. Topology is also somehow involved in anomaly cancellation.
Piers Coleman's article (focussing on condensed matter) provides a nice discussion of some of these concepts.
What do you think? What should I add or subtract from this list?
Some might suggest entanglement and/or quantum criticality or there own current favourite hot topic. However, I still remain to be convinced that these are key organising principles that are essential for understanding broad ranges of systems, rather than currently fashionable exotica.
I might include the Mott insulator, but I am not clear how that is relevant beyond solid state physics.
Is the list helpful? I am considering spending more time on this: perhaps a blog post on each concept, then a colloquium style talk, and a short tutorial review article.
I think the only mathematical entity needed to understand and illustrate all of this is a spectral function.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Emergence and protein folding
Proteins are a distinct state of matter. Globular proteins are tightly packed with a density comparable to a crystal but without the spatia...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
It looks interesting. I look forward to how you tie it all together with only the spectral function.
ReplyDeleteI would add hydrodynamics to the list as it supplies connections between low frequency excitations, conserved quantities and broken symmetries.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the suggestion.
DeleteOn one level I agree. On another, I find it surprising how little hydrodynamics actually does get used. Could you give some specific examples?
In my opinion, the first 4 points are a bit redundant, and could be condensed in two or three. I would add phase transitions (classical and quantum) and universality (possibly in a separate bullet point). The latter being a universal concept completely transversal in physics, as long as there a many degrees of freedom in the system.
ReplyDeleteAdam
Adam, thanks for the useful feedback.
DeleteI agree that the first 4 points overlap and could be combined. However, I think they are so basic and profound that they should be spelt out, particularly to beginning students.
I would include phase transitions under broken symmetry. I agree that universality needs to be added. It ties in with several points.
I have never understood these spectral weight/spectral function arguments, so I'll stay tuned!
ReplyDeleteColeman's article via his homepage:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.physics.rutgers.edu/%7Ecoleman/620/mbody/unfinished_frontier.pdf
I would add sum rules to this list as they provide useful constraints to any viable theory and are also helpful in analyzing experimental data.
ReplyDeleteSum rules is on the list under incoherent excitations. But, perhaps the title should be "Sum rules and incoherent excitations"
Delete