I was pleased to see that the Chemistry prize was awarded to Dan Shechtman for the discovery of quasi-periodic materials that led to a new definition of crystal (quasi-crystals). Back in 2003 APS News published a nice discussion of the background to the paper which appeared in PRL in 1984 and is the 8th most cited PRL of all time.
An earlier post discusses why I teach undergraduates about quasi-crystals. It illustrates the fundamental logical principle that A implies B does not mean that B implies A. Specifically, just because a periodic arrangement of atoms is a sufficient condition for a discrete X-ray pattern does not mean that it is a necessary condition. It also shows students that what they read in textbooks may be wrong.
Shechtman is not the first condensed matter physicist to be awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry. Other recent examples include Walter Kohn and Alan Heeger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From Leo Szilard to the Tasmanian wilderness
Richard Flanagan is an esteemed Australian writer. My son recently gave our family a copy of Flanagan's recent book, Question 7 . It is...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro...
-
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
I think the periodic arrangement is sufficient, but not necessary!
ReplyDeleteYou are correct!
ReplyDeleteI have changed it.