I struggle to set good exam questions. One wants to test knowledge and understanding in a way that is realistic within the constraints of students abilities and backgrounds.
I do not have a well-defined philosophy or approach, except for often recycling my old questions...
I think I do have a prejudice towards two goals.
A. Testing higher level skills [e.g. relating theory to experiment, putting things in context, ...] as much as specific technical knowledge [e.g. state Bloch's theorem or solve the Schrodinger equation for a charged particle in constant magnetic field].
B. Testing general and useful knowledge. For basic undergraduate courses [e.g. years 1 to 3] the question should be one that another faculty member could do, even if they have not taught the course. Sometimes, colleagues write questions that I cannot do. You have to have done the problem before, e.g. in a tutorial. We seeming to be testing whether someone has done this course, not "essential" knowledge.
However, I am not sure I really go anywhere near reaching these goals.
Here is a recent mid-semester exam I set for my solid state class of fourth-year undergraduates.
Is it reasonable?
How do you set exam questions?
Do you have a particular approach?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A very effective Hamiltonian in nuclear physics
Atomic nuclei are complex quantum many-body systems. Effective theories have helped provide a better understanding of them. The best-known a...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
If you look on the arXiv and in Nature journals there is a continuing stream of people claiming to observe superconductivity in some new mat...
-
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
Spinning this around, a good way for academics to make sure they are not losing valuable Physics knowledge and skills by being too specialised might be for them to occasionally solve undergraduate physics exams.
ReplyDeleteOn the note of what to write in exams, constructive alignment (see Wikipedia) suggests exams should be written at the start of the course to ensure that they do test the learning objectives for the course... Not sure how much help this is in practical terms.
I really enjoy your blog, by the way! Thank you for posting so regularly.
I think the exam is very reasonable. It tests understanding at the right level.
ReplyDeleteNot knowing where to post this news in your great blog. Here is the funding from Zukenberg for " BioRxiv preprint server gets funding from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/biorxiv-preprint-server-gets-funding-chan-zuckerberg-initiative
Will chemists and engineers follow this ?