This is the main point of a nice article by Roald Hoffmann, that I posted about in the early days of this blog.
I experienced this a few weeks ago. I have been working on a paper with my postdoc Nandan Pakhira about the viscosity of strongly correlated fermion fluids, focussing on the Hubbard model. A basic issue I got quite confused about is the relation between the momentum, Bloch wave vector, and velocity of an electron in a Bloch state. Yet, I when I taught this to my solid state physics class I was reminded of the correct result.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Science job openings in sunny Brisbane, Australia
Bribie Island, just north of Brisbane. The University of Queensland has just advertised several jobs that may be of interest to readers of t...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
Nitrogen fluoride (NF) seems like a very simple molecule and you would think it would very well understood, particularly as it is small enou... -
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
I have a naive question about the viscosity. The mechanical momentum is no longer conserved when a lattice is present. In this case, is viscosity still a well defined concept at low energy?
ReplyDeleteHi Yuan Wan,
DeleteThank you for your question. I don't think it is naive, but rather profound.
I think the viscosity is well-defined in a lattice system for the same reason that any "low-energy" macroscopic transport coefficient quantity (cf. conductivity) that is actually defined in a long-wavelength (i.e. continuum) limit.
But, I may be missing something.
Nandan and I are trying to make this clear in the paper we are finishing.