Recently I was asked by a university to evaluate an individual for tenure and promotion. The process was fascinating and I found refreshing.
The university send me copies of a selection of the individuals papers and a copy of a short CV. I was asked to review the scientific merit of the papers and thus comment on the suitability of the individual for tenure. There was no discussion of grant money received, numbers of Ph.D students graduated, number of publications, citation metrics, university "service", public outreach, journal impact factors, speaking invitations, .....
I found this refreshing, since it was in striking contrast to the values and emphasis of most institutions, which are very concerned with these other criteria, that I consider are secondary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The role of superconductivity in development of the Standard Model
In 1986, Steven Weinberg published an article, Superconductivity for Particular Theorists , in which he stated "No one did more than N...
-
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
Nitrogen fluoride (NF) seems like a very simple molecule and you would think it would very well understood, particularly as it is small enou... -
I welcome discussion on this point. I don't think it is as sensitive or as important a topic as the author order on papers. With rega...
thank you for your encouraging comment!
ReplyDelete