I just encountered this simple and helpful question in the context of how and what we teach students.
If we teach science as a static body of knowledge (particularly facts, theories, and techniques) we are acting as if science is a noun.
By contrast, if we focus on teaching students to think scientifically and critically, to solve problems, and to ask questions, then we act as if science is a verb.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are chemical isomers emergent?
In discussions of emergence, particularly in chemistry, isomers are often given as an example of an emergent phenomenon. In Anderson's o...
-
This week Nobel Prizes will be announced. I have not done predictions since 2020 . This is a fun exercise. It is also good to reflect on w... -
Is it something to do with breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation? In molecular spectroscopy you occasionally hear this term thro... -
Nitrogen fluoride (NF) seems like a very simple molecule and you would think it would very well understood, particularly as it is small enou...
Q. what's the past tense of science?
ReplyDeleteA "Republican"...although perhaps it's the future imperfect or "present denial" tense