I thought for a while and decided on John Bardeen. There is a lot I find interesting. He is the only person to receive two Nobel Prizes in Physics. Arguably, the discovery associated with both prizes (transistor, BCS theory) are of greater significance than the average Nobel. The difficult relationship with Shockley, who in some sense became the founder of Silicon Valley.
Here are my slides.
In preparing the talk I read the interesting articles in the April 1992 issue of Physics Today that was completely dedicated to Bardeen. In his article David Pines, says
[Bardeen's] approach to scientific problems went something like this:
- Focus first on the experimental results, by careful reading of the literature and personal contact with members of leading experimental groups.
- Develop a phenomenological description that ties the key experimental facts together.
- Avoid bringing along prior theoretical baggage, and do not insist that a phenomenological description map onto a particular theoretical model. Explore alternative physical pictures and mathematical descriptions without becoming wedded to a specific theoretical approach.
- Use thermodynamic and macroscopic arguments before proceeding to microscopic calculations.
- Focus on physical understanding, not mathematical elegance. Use the simplest possible mathematical descriptions.
- Keep up with new developments and techniques in theory, for one of these could prove useful for the problem at hand.
- Don't give up! Stay with the problem until it's solved.
In summary, John believed in a bottom-up, experimentally based approach to doing physics, as distinguished from a top-down, model-driven approach. To put it another way, deciding on an appropriate model Hamiltonian was John's penultimate step in solving a problem, not his first.With regard to "interesting stories or anecdotes about people, discoveries, and ideas relating to physics," what would you talk about?